Know Your Rights: Understanding When Police Can Search Your RV
Generally speaking, the answer to the question “Can the police search my RV without a warrant?” is no, because the Fourth Amendment protects your privacy.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.Fourth Amendment
That’s the law, but of course every situation is different. It’s these unique circumstances that give rise to all the case law that further defines how the Fourth Amendment should be interpreted and applied. And that is where we encounter all the exceptions to our Fourth Amendment privacy expectations. So, what are the exceptions that give the police the authority to search your RV without a warrant?
The police search must be based on probable cause
The Fourth Amendment states that a search may be conducted when the police obtain a warrant that is based on probable cause. The probable cause must establish that a crime is being committed, that evidence of a crime is present, or that contraband is present, and these facts must be supported by an oath (in a practical sense, that means a written affidavit describing the details that establish the probable cause).
Obtaining a search warrant takes time. Even if the police officer has clear probable cause, they still need to write the supporting affidavit, present it to a judge, obtain his/her signature, and then return to the location to execute the search. In my experience as a police officer, this process takes a minimum of four or five hours and depends on what time of day or night you are seeking the warrant.
So, how can the Fourth Amendment be upheld while also preserving the rights of drivers who are not subject to a vehicle search? Is it fair to require passengers to wait on the roadside for hours while an officer prepares an affidavit, finds a judge, secures a signature, and obtains a warrant? To resolve this predicament, an exception called exigent circumstances has been established. Nevertheless, law enforcement officials must still establish probable cause before conducting a warrantless search.
Exigent circumstances state that warrantless searches of vehicles (including the trunk, luggage, or other containers which may reasonably contain evidence or contraband) are lawful. This may be where your RV could be searched by the police without a warrant, but it’s not universally applicable in all situations.
For example, if you’re driving a truck towing a fifth wheel trailer in a state where marijuana is illegal, and you get stopped by the police who smell marijuana emanating from your truck, the officer has probable cause to believe that contraband is present in your truck, but does not have probable cause that contraband is present in your fifth wheel trailer. It might be plausible to assume that if you have marijuana in your truck, you may also have it in your trailer, but plausible is not probable. Therefore, the officer can legally search your truck without a warrant, but not your trailer.
There are a few different ways to establish probable cause, and one of the most obvious is plain view. When evidence of a crime or contraband is in plain view, it immediately establishes probable cause.
An example of this might be as follows: A police officer legally pulls over a motorhome because the license plate is partially obscured.
This actually happened to us in Alabama. We had a temporary Florida plate on the RV, and Oregon plates on the tow car, but the officer couldn’t see the state, so he pulled us over.
If when he walked up to the driver’s window of our motorhome, he had seen a stack of crates in plain view from the driver’s window, piled up behind the co-pilot’s seat, and each crate had a blindfolded chicken or rooster with leather straps around their claws, he would have had probable cause to believe we were in possession of contraband (fighting birds), and he would have had the right to conduct a warrantless search of our entire motorhome. Just to be clear, the last part of this example did not apply to our situation.
Another way officers can establish probable cause is when evidence of crimes or contraband is in the public view. This may seem like a no-brainer, but as a police officer, I had many occasions to obtain search warrants based solely on what was readily observable and in public view.
Using the marijuana example again, let’s say you’re from Colorado, and before you left home, you decided to take one of your marijuana plants with you in your RV. Now you’re camped for a couple of weeks in a state where using marijuana is legal, so you put your marijuana plant on the picnic table so it can get some sun. The marijuana plant is in public view, and a police officer who happens to be in the park for another matter notices the plant on your picnic table. They know that using marijuana in that state is legal, but growing marijuana falls under a separate statute called “manufacturing a controlled substance,” and it’s a felony.
The public view of the plant gives them probable cause, and they may execute a warrantless search of your RV because it’s reasonable to assume that if you have evidence of the crime of manufacturing a controlled substance in public view, you may also have additional contraband, manufacturing paraphernalia, or controlled substances out of sight in your RV.
Even if you are scheduled to stay in the park for a couple of weeks, they don’t have time to obtain a search warrant because exigent circumstances still exist. You’re camping in a vehicle that could be back on the road in a flash. It’s like someone committing a crime in an Airbnb or hotel. Just because these structures have a fixed address doesn’t mean the occupants or the contraband will still be there tomorrow. Unfortunately for you, searching your RV without a warrant based on their articulation of the public view probable cause would be the most prudent police procedure.
The final type of situation that could lead to a warrantless search of your RV is an administrative search, such as a roadblock, checkpoint, or border crossing. In the case of a roadblock or checkpoint, the issues of plain and public view are particularly relevant, but in the case of a border crossing, the scope of warrantless searches is boundless.
Border agents may inspect any part of your RV, as well as your towing or towed vehicle. They can search any cupboard, container, cabinet, or crevice and take as long as needed to confirm that you are not engaged in any illegal activity or carrying any contraband. If you intend to cross any national border (regardless of which direction you are going), then you should review what can legally be transported across that border. We have had firewood, potatoes, and citrus fruit confiscated by border agents, and we voluntarily surrendered our mace that we had forgotten to dispose of before crossing into Canada. Warrantless searches at any border crossing can be extensive and intrusive, and you should be prepared for the unexpected.
A warrantless search of your RV is a much broader discussion than what has been covered in this article. Additionally, the law is constantly changing because of new case law being adjudicated, which redefines how the Fourth Amendment should be interpreted and what exceptions impact the prevailing interpretations.
As a final note, I wrote this summary based on my background as a former police officer. But I am sure all the lawyers in our RV community who are reading this have a much deeper understanding of all the issues surrounding lawful and unlawful warrantless searches. Therefore, for the benefit of our readers, you are all invited to comment on or clarify any of these points in the comment section below.
- What not to do when your RV is pulled over by the police
- Think Twice Before RVing With Marijuana Across State Lines
Peggy Dent is an author, writer, and full-time RVer, traveling around the US and Canada. She’s traveled more than 130,000 miles in a motorhome, over the past 20 years, and is currently writing for the RV industry. You can contact her through her website at www.APenInYourHand.com
Michael jones says
Unless they have RAS, reasonable articulated suspicion, they have to have a warrant. US Supreme Court has several rulings on this to include extending a stop excessively to get drug dogs there. Know your rights. 21 year leo.
Dennis Goebelt says
Two years ago we attempted to visit Boulder Dam with our pull behind camper. The guard asked us if we had any weapons. He was really aggressive. He said that the government reserves the right to search ALL vehicles; and told be to drive to a part of the lot where they would conduct a search of my truck and camper. I politely told him that he would need a warrant. My truck was immediately surrounded by at least 8 armed officers who barely gave me enough room to turn around and leave. I was furious!
Daniel A Wallinder says
We were in New Zeland And had a micrometer peice of dried jerky in our carry on luggage and was stopped by their TSA agent A beagle.
Robert Hoelscher says
Thank you for your informative article!
Colby Goodson says
No warrant is needed if any individuals in the vehicle have an open or outstanding warrant for thier arrest. Also if a court date has been missed.
I have had a lot of trouble with police in Kansas over this issues, especily when I was still registered in Colorado and just passing through. Pulled over on I-70 because my rear tire touched the white line. Yeah right, they need to come up with a better story I think. After a thirty minute interogation about where I’d been and where i was going and why and a threat of drug sniffing dogs, I declined the search. I asked if i could pet the dog and advised them to get a warant as I was in my house and lived there full time. He gave me a courtesy ticket for improper lane usage and left.
The next time it was in far southwest Kansas and I was pulled over by a city cop for an ileagle lane change because after I saw him following me closely I went ahead and started to pull into a parking lot but he said I didn’t signal for the required 100 yards before changing lanes. After another interogation and another decline another courtesy ticket he did the Kansas two step where they walk away and then come back and start a further conversation trying to get you to intcriminate yourself.
I go to Mexico in the winter and have less trouble with the CBP than Kansas cops! I do tell the CBP that I’ve got rid of my tomatoes and eggs and potatoes and they take a quick glance and i’m on my way, no threats, no intimidation.
I figure I’ve got all day, I live in my RV, get a warrant. So far I’ve been right.
Flash Alexander says
Yes, but they would need to verify a passenger’s identity. How are they going to do that? “You kinda look like this guy we’re looking for” isn’t going to work, unless they violate one’s rights. “Show me your ID” should be met with “No”.
Tell me you’re not an attorney without telling me you’re not an attorney.
Bob P says
Refusing a lawful request can get you in more trouble than cooperating.
r one says
Passengers do not have to talk to or provide ID unless they have committed a crime and was seen by the LEO doing the crime. The exception is if it is a stop and ID state. LEO have the right to lie to you to trick you into giving up your rights. Tell them you do not consent to search of you or your property without a warrant even if being arrested, let a lawyer handle it in court. You have the right to remain silent so keep silent. You don’t have to tell them where you are coming form or where you are going. They are always phishing for a reason to search when they are asking questions. If there is a problem ask to see a supervisor on the spot.
Don’t just think you are doing nothing wrong, you have no obligation to help them by answering any questions even when they say they are investigating something.
Bob P says
It hasn’t happened to me but I’ve heard that states such as NJ, NY that are anti gun will pull a vehicle over that has out of state tags from a state that believes in the 2nd Amendment to search for guns and confiscate them and charge you with transporting weapons.
Daniel Jenkins says
I guess the main comment that I have is when do the police ever follow the law? Not often enough and when they do break the law, the infraction is generally whitewashed.
John Walker says
I had my RV searched in a small town in TX after being pulled over for no apparent reason (I was in the right lane, under the speed limit, dead sober, insured, licensed). The officer never did say why he pulled me over but did ask permission to search, probably because of the California license plate. I declined of course but he had his trusty dog with him and he lied and said that since the dog sat on command that established probable cause to search (look up “UC Davis drug dog study” to see why the whole drug dog thing is a lie). Long story short after he and his backup Barney Fife let me out of the back of Barney’s patrol car he told me “don’t be so nervous” like I could control that – two small town Texas cops lock me in a car while they search my RV for a reason to screw me over – what’s to be nervous?
DARYL TANNER says
“Lawful” IS THE PONT!